diff --git a/release-packaging/HelpSource/Classes/FluidSines.schelp b/release-packaging/HelpSource/Classes/FluidSines.schelp index f419a7c..c34d207 100644 --- a/release-packaging/HelpSource/Classes/FluidSines.schelp +++ b/release-packaging/HelpSource/Classes/FluidSines.schelp @@ -82,6 +82,12 @@ b = Buffer.read(s,File.realpath(FluidSines.class.filenameSymbol).dirname.withTra // as the algorithm resynthesize the sinusoidal peaks, we would expect to get it to work almost perfectly on a sine wave, with these settings that tell the process to tolerate everything as a sinusoid, even short and quiet peaks {FluidSines.ar(SinOsc.ar(mul: 0.1),detectionThreshold: -144,birthLowThreshold: -144,birthHighThreshold: -144,minTrackLen: 1,trackMagRange: 200,trackFreqRange: 1000,trackProb: 0)}.play; +// we can listen to the artefact in solo, amplifying it by 30dB, to hear the 'lobes' - not bad at all! +{FluidSines.ar(SinOsc.ar(mul: 0.1),detectionThreshold: -144,birthLowThreshold: -144,birthHighThreshold: -144,minTrackLen: 1,trackMagRange: 200,trackFreqRange: 1000,trackProb: 0)[1].dup * Line.ar(0,30,1).dbamp}.play; + // as this is a windowed process, the frequency of the peak is good for that full window, and therefore interesting artefacts appear when the pitch is changing. {FluidSines.ar(SinOsc.ar(LFTri.kr(0.1).exprange(220,880),mul: 0.1),detectionThreshold: -144,birthLowThreshold: -144,birthHighThreshold: -144,minTrackLen: 1,trackMagRange: 300,trackFreqRange: 1000,trackProb: 0)}.play; + +// if we solo and amplify the artefacts, they are much more apparent (and interesting) +{FluidSines.ar(SinOsc.ar(LFTri.kr(0.1).exprange(220,880),mul: 0.1),detectionThreshold: -144,birthLowThreshold: -144,birthHighThreshold: -144,minTrackLen: 1,trackMagRange: 300,trackFreqRange: 1000,trackProb: 0)[1].dup * Line.ar(0,30,1).dbamp}.play; ::